Financial Remedy advice across Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, the North East and beyond.
The divorce process ends the marriage. It does not automatically sort out the finances.
The house, the pensions, the income, the savings, the debts, the business interests: these require a separate legal process. Without a financial order from the court, claims on each other’s assets can remain open for years after the marriage has legally ended. Most people are not aware of this until it becomes a problem.
Our family team advise on financial settlements from the start of a separation to the final order, whether that is reached by agreement or through court proceedings.
A financial settlement can deal with:
The court does not apply a fixed formula. It looks at what is fair and reasonable, taking into account all of the circumstances of the case and a range of factors set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.
The welfare of any minor children comes first. After that, the court considers each person’s income, earning capacity and financial resources, their financial needs and obligations, the standard of living during the marriage, the age of both parties and how long the marriage lasted, each person’s contribution to the family whether financial or otherwise, and in limited circumstances the conduct of the parties. The court will consider the rights the parties will lose if the order is made.
No two financial settlements look exactly alike. What is fair in one case can look very different from another, even where the numbers are similar.
Pensions are consistently one of the largest assets in a divorce and the most frequently overlooked. A pension built over a working life can be worth more than the family home, but because it is not immediately accessible it tends not to register in negotiations the way property does.
There are different ways to deal with pensions on divorce: pension sharing, pension offsetting and pension attachment. Each has different long-term implications. Where pensions are substantial, taking independent financial advice alongside legal advice is worth considering.
Court proceedings are not always necessary. Most financial settlements are reached through negotiation between solicitors, mediation or a combination of both.
Where agreement is reached it needs to be written into a “Consent Order” and submitted to court to be approved and if approved would become legally binding. An informal agreement, however clearly worded, does not have the same effect and does not dismiss future claims wither party to the marriage may have against the other.
Where negotiation fails, financial remedy proceedings give the court the power to decide. The process involves both parties giving full financial disclosure, setting out their assets, income and financial position, with a series of court hearings.
Most cases settle before a final hearing. Knowing what a court would be likely to decide, and being able to demonstrate that clearly, puts you in a better position in negotiations whether or not proceedings are ultimately issued.
No. The starting point in England and Wales is to achieve a fair and reasonable division, which does not always mean an equal one. What is fair and reasonable depends on the circumstances of each case, and the court has wide discretion. In shorter marriages, contributions tend to carry more weight. In longer marriages with children, needs often take priority.
A consent order records the financial agreement reached between the parties and is approved by the court, and in most cases without the need for the parties to attend a court hearing. Once approved it is legally binding and enforceable. Without one, the agreement has no legal force and financial claims remain open.
The house is part of the financial settlement. Options include one party buying the other out, selling and dividing the proceeds, or where children are involved, possibly delaying a sale to a specific point such as when they finish school. if an agreement is reached it needs to be recorded in a consent order and approved by the court to be binding.
The process to negotiating a settlement usually requires both parties to give full and frank financial disclosure. The court takes non-disclosure seriously and there are ways to investigate finances where there is reason to suspect assets are being concealed or moved. Taking early advice if you suspect this is happening is important.
Most people do not attend a hearing, particular if matters are agreed and written in to a Consent Order for the court to approve. Where agreement is reached through negotiation or mediation, the consent order process is largely on paper. Hearings are more common where the dispute cannot be resolved and the court needs to decide.
An agreed settlement reached cooperatively can be concluded relatively quickly. Contested proceedings take considerably longer, depending on the complexity of the case and court availability.
The court can order spousal maintenance where one party cannot meet their reasonable needs from their own resources and if it is fair and reasonable to do so. A clean break order dismisses both parties’ financial claims against each other at the same time. The court generally prefers a clean break where it is achievable.
We will explain clearly where you stand and what your options are.
“
Consult with our experienced team for complete solutions to your legal issues.
Pepperells Limited, registered in England and Wales: No. 10244781 | Registered Office: 100 Alfred Gelder Street, Hull, East Yorkshire, HU1 2AE | Authorised & Regulated by The Solicitors Regulation Authority | Regulation Authority Numbers 636188, 638556, 638554, 647027, 668558, 807163, 818433, 832782, 830125, 8000373, 8007670, 8007671, 8009311, 8009312, 8013429, 8013430, 8013428 and 8013376 | www.sra.org.uk
Pepperells Solicitors are committed to ensuring that all Partners, Consultants and Employees give their full co-operation to the Legal Ombudsman in the event of any dispute or complaint against our firm, contact details of which can be found at www.legalombudsman.org.uk. VAT No. 365 0589 36